A fifth study linking more women on boards to a decline in corporate performance

Regular visitors to this blog will be aware that we’ve already provided links to four robust studies concerning decline in corporate performance following the appointment of more women onto boards. Perhaps the best-known is the Ahern/Dittmar study on the negative impact of legislated quotas on the performance of Norwegian publicly-listed companies. Proponents of ‘improved’ gender diversity on boards have failed to cite even one paper with such robust evidence to support their position.

I’ve just learnt of another academic paper on the Norwegian social engineering experiment, this one written by two American professors, David A Matsa (Northwestern University – Kellogg School of Management), and a professor of the female persuasion, Amalia R Miller (University of Virginia). The paper’s title is ‘A Female Style in Corporate Leadership? Evidence from Quotas’, and it was published in 2011. The  full Abstract:

This paper studies the impact of gender quotas for corporate board seats on corporate policy decisions. We examine the introduction of Norway’s 2006 quota, comparing affected firms to other Scandinavian companies, public and private, that were unaffected by the rule. Based on differences-in-differences and triple-difference models, we find that firms affected by the quota undertook fewer workforce reductions than comparison firms, increasing relative labor costs and employment levels and reducing short-term profits. The effects are strongest among firms that had no female board members before the quota was introduced and present even for boards with older and more experienced members. The boards appear to be affecting corporate strategy in part by selecting like-minded executives.

A link to the study (it’s downloadable at no cost):

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1636047

The finding that women influence boards to undertake ‘fewer workforce reductions’ will, of course, be welcomed by proponents of Corporate Social Responsibility, or as we term it here at C4MB headquarters, Corporate Social Engineering. What follows from this paper’s findings? It’s simple. Companies which recruit more women onto their boards will be at a competitive disadvantage compared with those which don’t. It’s hardly surprising their financial performance declines, is it? These companies are trying to act like public sector organisations. Hmm… now how might that end up?

I leave you with some immortal words penned by the Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman 50 years ago. From his book Capitalism and Freedom:

Few trends could so thoroughly undermine the very foundations of our free society as the acceptance by corporate officials of a social responsibility other than to make as much money for their stockholders as possible.

Advertisements

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s